Search
Close this search box.

Understanding Prior Use in Trademarks: A Key Principle of Trademark Law

Prior Use in Trademarks
Table of Contents

Introduction

Trademark law is an essential aspect of intellectual property law, designed to protect the identity and reputation of a business. In modern business, trademarks are crucial for product promotion. They serve as a barrier against competitors who copy and use similar marks.

Trademark is a type of intellectual property that helps to differentiate a company’s products from others through use of unique symbols, words or signs. Trademark protection ensures that the creator can exclusively benefit from their work and prevent unauthorized use by others.

Section 34 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, addresses a key aspect of trademark protection: the rights of prior use. This principle plays a crucial role in determining the rights and protection of trademarks, especially in cases of disputes.

In this article, we will explore the concept of prior use in trademarks, its legal standing in India, and its implications for businesses. We’ll break down the legal jargon and provide practical examples to make this principle easy to understand.

What is Prior Use in Trademarks?

Prior use in Trademark refers to the usage of a trademark by an entity or person before it is registered by someone else. In simple terms, if a business has been using a particular trademark for its goods or services for a considerable period before another party tries to register the same or a similar mark, the original user may have the right to continue using it. This is true even if the second party has obtained legal registration for the mark.

The doctrine of prior use is based on the principle of “first in time, first in right.” It recognizes that the original user of a trademark has established goodwill and reputation associated with that mark and it would be unfair to deprive them of the benefits they have accrued over time.

Legal Framework In The Trade Marks Act, 1999

In India, the Trade Marks Act, 1999 provides the legal framework for trademark registration and protection. Section 34 of the Act specifically addresses the concept of prior use. It states that if a person can prove that they have been using a trademark continuously from a date prior to the date of registration of a similar or identical trademark by another party, they have the right to continue using that trademark.

This provision highlights the importance of prior use in India’s trademark law. Even if a trademark is registered, it does not automatically mean that the registrant has an absolute right to use it. If another party can prove prior use, the registrant’s rights may be limited.

Importance of Prior Use in Trademark Disputes

The concept of prior use often comes into play in trademark disputes, especially in cases of infringement. Let’s take an example to illustrate this:

For example: Suppose Company A has been using the trademark “Sunshine Electronics” for its products since 2010. However, Company B, unaware of Company A’s existence, registers the trademark “Sunshine Electronics” in 2015. Later, Company B sues Company A for trademark infringement, claiming exclusive rights over the name.

In this situation, Company A can defend itself by invoking the principle of prior use. By providing evidence of continuous use of the trademark since 2010, Company A can challenge Company B’s claim and continue using the name.

This example underscores the significance of prior use as a defence in trademark infringement cases. It protects businesses from being ousted from the market by a later registrant.

The Onus of Proof: How to Establish Prior Use

To successfully claim prior use, the burden of proof lies on the party claiming it. The user must provide substantial evidence to demonstrate that they have been using the trademark before the other party’s registration. The evidence should establish:

  • Continuous use: The trademark has been used consistently without interruption.
  • Date of first use: The exact date when the trademark was first used.
  • Geographical scope: The regions where the trademark has been used.
  • Nature of use: The manner in which the trademark has been used (e.g., on products, packaging, advertising materials).

Some common forms of evidence include:

  • Invoices and sales records showing the sale of goods or services under the trademark.
  • Advertisements, brochures and promotional materials displaying the trademark.
  • Affidavits or declarations from customers or business partners attesting to the use of the trademark.
  • Online presence, such as websites and social media posts featuring the trademark.

The quality and quantity of evidence are crucial in establishing prior use. The stronger the evidence, the higher the chances of successfully defending a trademark claim based on prior use.

The "First to Use" vs. "First to File" Debate

Trademark systems around the world generally follow two approaches: “first to use” and “first to file.”

  • First to use: This system, followed in India and the United States, gives priority to the party that first uses the trademark in commerce regardless of registration.
  • First to file: In countries like China and Germany, the first party to file a trademark application is given priority, even if another party has been using the mark earlier.

India’s preference for the “first to use” principle reflects its emphasis on protecting the goodwill and reputation established by the original user. It ensures that businesses that have invested time and resources in building a brand are not unfairly disadvantaged by later registrants.

Prior Use vs. Well-Known Trademarks

An interesting aspect of trademark law is the intersection of prior use and well-known trademarks. A well-known trademark is a mark that is recognized by a significant portion of the public even if it is not registered in a particular jurisdiction. These trademarks enjoy broader protection under the law.

However, the principle of prior use can still apply to well-known trademarks. If a business has been using a trademark in a specific region or industry before it became well-known, it may have the right to continue using it in that context. This situation can lead to conflicts between prior users and the owners of well-known trademarks, requiring careful legal consideration.

The Role of the Registrar and Courts in Prior Use Disputes

In India, the Registrar of Trademarks and the courts play a critical role in resolving disputes related to prior use. When a trademark application is opposed on the grounds of prior use, the Registrar examines the evidence presented by both parties and determines the validity of the claim.

If the dispute escalates to the courts, judges consider various factors, such as the duration and extent of prior use, the likelihood of confusion and the impact on the original user’s business. Indian courts have consistently upheld the principle of prior use, recognizing its importance in maintaining fairness in the marketplace.

Case Studies: Landmark Judgments on Prior Use

Several landmark judgments in India have shaped the interpretation of prior use in trademark law. Let’s take a look at a few famous cases:

  • Century Traders vs. Roshan Lal Duggar & Co. (1977): In this case, the Delhi High Court held that prior use of a trademark even without registration, entitles the user to protect their rights. The court emphasized that registration is not necessary to establish trademark rights if prior use can be proven.
  • S. Syed Mohideen vs. P. Sulochana Bai (2016): The Supreme Court of India ruled that the mere registration of a trademark does not confer absolute rights. The court upheld the principle that prior use takes precedence over registration, protecting the rights of the original user.
  • Neon Laboratories Ltd. vs. Medical Technologies Ltd. (2015): The Supreme Court reiterated that prior use of a trademark is a valid defense against an infringement claim. The court stressed that continuous use of the mark, even without registration, can establish rights.

These cases highlight the Indian judiciary’s commitment to safeguarding the rights of prior users and ensuring that the trademark system remains fair and just.

Practical Tips for Businesses: Protecting Your Trademark Rights

Given the importance of prior use in trademark law, businesses must be proactive in protecting their rights. Here are some practical tips:

  • Document your use: Maintain thorough records of your trademark’s use including invoices, advertisements and other relevant documents. This evidence can be invaluable in case of a dispute.
  • Consider registration: While prior use can protect your rights, registering your trademark adds an extra layer of security. It provides legal recognition and can deter others from using similar marks.
  • Monitor the market: Keep an eye on competitors and new trademark registrations. If you notice a similar mark being registered, you may need to take action to protect your rights.
  • Consult a trademark attorney: Trademark law can be complex and seeking professional advice can help you navigate the legal landscape effectively.
Conclusion: The Power of Prior Use

The principle of prior use is a cornerstone of trademark law in India. It ensures that businesses that have invested time, effort and resources in building their brands are not unfairly displaced by later registrants. By recognizing the rights of original users, the law promotes fairness and stability in the marketplace.

Understanding prior use and its implications is essential for any business that relies on trademarks to distinguish its goods or services. Whether you are a small startup or an established company, being aware of your rights and responsibilities under trademark law can help you protect your brand and thrive in a competitive market.

As the legal landscape continues to evolve, businesses must stay informed and vigilant. Prior use is not just a legal doctrine—it is a powerful tool that can safeguard your business’s identity and ensure that your hard-earned reputation remains intact.

Trademark Registration
Trademark Registration
Trademark Objection Reply
Trademark Objection Reply
Trademark Renewal
Trademark Renewal
Trademark Hearing
Trademark Hearing
Scroll to Top